Sales and operations planning: empirical insights into perceived relevance and lack of implementation

Jan Stentoft*, Christopher Rajkumar, Per Vagn Freytag, Ole Stegmann Mikkelsen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The objective of the paper is to advance the understanding of the relationship between the reasons for not using Sales & Operations Planning (S&OP), the perceived relevance of S&OP and the performance of the firm. This study is based on 156 valid answers to a questionnaire-survey distributed among Danish manufacturers. Furthermore, secondary performance data on return on investment and net income index are included in the analysis. The results indicate that the more the respondents perceive a lack of knowledge about S&OP the more they perceive the relevance of S&OP. The results also convey that the more the respondents perceive unrecognised needs the less they perceive the relevance of S&OP. Furthermore, the results show that lack of implementation skills does not influence the relevance of S&OP. The results also indicate that the perceived relevance of S&OP is interrelated with sales performance in terms of customer and delivery performance but not with operational or financial performance.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSupply Chain Forum: an international journal
Volume21
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)246-259
ISSN1625-8312
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29. Oct 2020

Keywords

  • Questionnaire survey
  • SME
  • maturity
  • performance
  • readiness

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sales and operations planning: empirical insights into perceived relevance and lack of implementation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this