Total Hip Arthroplasty Versus Education and Exercise: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of 266 Patients Who Have Hip Osteoarthritis

Background Total hip arthroplasty (THA) for osteoarthritis (OA) is a major health system cost. Education and exercise (Edu+Ex) programs may reduce the number of THAs needed, but supporting data is limited. This study aimed to estimate the treatment effect of THA versus Edu+Ex on pain, function, and quality of life outcomes 3- and 12-months after treatment initiation for hip OA. Methods Patients who had hip OA who underwent THA or an Edu+Ex program were included in this propensity-matched study. In 778 patients (Edu+Ex n = 303; THA n = 475), propensity scores were based on pre-treatment characteristics, and patients were matched on a 1:1 ratio. Between-group treatment effects (pain, function, and quality of life) were estimated as the mean difference in change from pre-treatment to 3- and 12-month follow-up using linear mixed models. Results The matched sample consisted of 266 patients (Edu+Ex n = 133; THA n = 133) that were balanced on all pre-treatment characteristics except opioid use. At 12-month follow-up, THA resulted in significantly greater improvements in pain (mean difference [MD] 35.4; 95% CI [confidence interval] 31.4 to 39.4), function (MD 30.5; 95% CI 26.3 to 34.7), and quality of life (MD 33.6; 95% CI 28.8 to 38.4). Between 17 and 30% of patients receiving Edu+Ex experienced a surgical threshold for clinically meaningful improvement in outcomes, compared to 84 and 90% of THA patients. Conclusions A THA provides greater improvements in pain, function, and quality of life. A significant proportion of Edu+Ex patients had clinically meaningful improvements, suggesting Edu+Ex may result in THA deferral in some patients, but confirmatory trials are needed.