TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of a multifaceted intervention programme on antibiotic prescribing and dispensing in four patient-centred settings in five European countries. The HAPPY PATIENT project
AU - García-Sangenís, Ana
AU - Lykkegaard, Jesper
AU - Hansen, Malene Plejdrup
AU - González López-Valcárcel, Beatriz
AU - Raynal, Fabiana
AU - Vallejo-Torres, Laura
AU - Bjerrum, Lars
AU - Chalkidou, Athina
AU - Jensen, Jette Nygaard
AU - Rebnord, Ingrid
AU - Lindberg, Bent Håkan
AU - Taxis, Katja
AU - Lambert, Maarten
AU - Radzeviciene, Ruta
AU - Jaruseviciene, Lina
AU - Touboul Lundgren, Pia
AU - Bruno, Pascale
AU - Lesage, Vanessa
AU - Kowalczyk, Anna
AU - Godycki-Cwirko, Maciej
AU - Lionis, Christos
AU - Karkana, Maria-Nefeli
AU - Anastasaki, Marilena
AU - Hansen, Matilde Bøgelund
AU - Olsen, Jonas Kanstrup
AU - Søndergaard, Jens
AU - Modena, Daniela
AU - Mally, Stella
AU - Álvarez, Laura
AU - Llor, Carl
N1 - © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.
PY - 2024/11/12
Y1 - 2024/11/12
N2 - BACKGROUND: The primary cause of antimicrobial resistance is excessive and non-indicated antibiotic use.AIM: To evaluate the impact of a multifaceted intervention aimed at various healthcare professionals (HCPs) on antibiotic prescribing and dispensing for common infections.DESIGN AND SETTING: Before-and-after study set in general practice, out-of-hours services, nursing homes, and community pharmacies in France, Greece, Lithuania, Poland, and Spain.METHODS: Following the Audit Project Odense method, HCPs from these four settings self-registered encounters with patients related to antibiotic prescribing and dispensing before and after an intervention (February-April 2022 and February-April 2023). Prior to the second registration, the HCPs undertook a multifaceted intervention, which included reviewing and discussing feedback on the first registration's results, enhancing communication skills, and providing communication tools. Indicators to identify potentially unnecessary prescriptions and non-first-line antibiotic choices were developed, and the results of the two registrations were compared.RESULTS: A total of 345 HCPs registered 10 744 infections in the first registration period and 10 207 infections in the second period. In general practice, participants showed a significant 9.8% reduction in unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions in the second period, whereas limited or no effect was observed in out-of-hours services and nursing homes (0.8% reduction and 4.5% increase, respectively). Pharmacies demonstrated an 18% increase in safety checks, and correct advice in pharmacies rose by 17%.CONCLUSION: External factors like COVID-19, antibiotic shortages, and a streptococcal epidemic impacted the intervention's benefits. Despite this, the intervention successfully improved antibiotic use in both settings.
AB - BACKGROUND: The primary cause of antimicrobial resistance is excessive and non-indicated antibiotic use.AIM: To evaluate the impact of a multifaceted intervention aimed at various healthcare professionals (HCPs) on antibiotic prescribing and dispensing for common infections.DESIGN AND SETTING: Before-and-after study set in general practice, out-of-hours services, nursing homes, and community pharmacies in France, Greece, Lithuania, Poland, and Spain.METHODS: Following the Audit Project Odense method, HCPs from these four settings self-registered encounters with patients related to antibiotic prescribing and dispensing before and after an intervention (February-April 2022 and February-April 2023). Prior to the second registration, the HCPs undertook a multifaceted intervention, which included reviewing and discussing feedback on the first registration's results, enhancing communication skills, and providing communication tools. Indicators to identify potentially unnecessary prescriptions and non-first-line antibiotic choices were developed, and the results of the two registrations were compared.RESULTS: A total of 345 HCPs registered 10 744 infections in the first registration period and 10 207 infections in the second period. In general practice, participants showed a significant 9.8% reduction in unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions in the second period, whereas limited or no effect was observed in out-of-hours services and nursing homes (0.8% reduction and 4.5% increase, respectively). Pharmacies demonstrated an 18% increase in safety checks, and correct advice in pharmacies rose by 17%.CONCLUSION: External factors like COVID-19, antibiotic shortages, and a streptococcal epidemic impacted the intervention's benefits. Despite this, the intervention successfully improved antibiotic use in both settings.
U2 - 10.1093/fampra/cmae064
DO - 10.1093/fampra/cmae064
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 39531344
SN - 0263-2136
JO - Family Practice
JF - Family Practice
ER -