TY - JOUR
T1 - Animal Models Used to Explore Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
T2 - A Systematic Review
AU - Lysgaard Poulsen, J
AU - Stubbe, J
AU - Lindholt, J S
N1 - Copyright © 2016 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/8/16
Y1 - 2016/8/16
N2 - OBJECTIVE: Experimental animal models have been used to investigate the formation, development, and progression of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) for decades. New models are constantly being developed to imitate the mechanisms of human AAAs and to identify treatments that are less risky than those used today. However, to the authors' knowledge, there is no model identical to the human AAA. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the different types of animal models used to investigate the development, progression, and treatment of AAA and to highlight their advantages and limitations.METHODS: A search protocol was used to perform a systematic literature search of PubMed and Embase. A total of 2,830 records were identified. After selection of the relevant articles, 564 papers on animal AAA models were included.RESULTS: The most common models in rodents, including elastase, calcium chloride, angiotensin II, xenograft, and transgenic models, and the most common models in non-rodents, including chemically induced, graft models, and patch models, all have limitations with regard to the pathological interpretation of human AAA.CONCLUSION: Although findings from animal models of AAAs cannot be directly translated to human AAAs, the identification and awareness of animal models of AAA will provide knowledge for further investigation and insight into human AAA disease.
AB - OBJECTIVE: Experimental animal models have been used to investigate the formation, development, and progression of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) for decades. New models are constantly being developed to imitate the mechanisms of human AAAs and to identify treatments that are less risky than those used today. However, to the authors' knowledge, there is no model identical to the human AAA. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the different types of animal models used to investigate the development, progression, and treatment of AAA and to highlight their advantages and limitations.METHODS: A search protocol was used to perform a systematic literature search of PubMed and Embase. A total of 2,830 records were identified. After selection of the relevant articles, 564 papers on animal AAA models were included.RESULTS: The most common models in rodents, including elastase, calcium chloride, angiotensin II, xenograft, and transgenic models, and the most common models in non-rodents, including chemically induced, graft models, and patch models, all have limitations with regard to the pathological interpretation of human AAA.CONCLUSION: Although findings from animal models of AAAs cannot be directly translated to human AAAs, the identification and awareness of animal models of AAA will provide knowledge for further investigation and insight into human AAA disease.
KW - Abdominal aortic aneurysms
KW - Animal models
KW - Experimental models
KW - Pathophysiology
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.07.004
DO - 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.07.004
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 27543385
SN - 1078-5884
VL - 52
SP - 487
EP - 499
JO - European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
JF - European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
IS - 4
ER -